Re: set of OPES documents

["The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Some WG's produce a "roadmap" document that does this.  However, experience
shows that a large number of related drafts is a situation to be avoided
wherever possible.  It seems like a good idea at first, but if they
need to cross-reference each other it becomes a nightmare to keep them
all in sync.  Years later backlash sets in.

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 at 10:43:27 -0600 (MDT) Alex Rousskov asked:
>  Also, given a relatively large number of related drafts, would it make
>  any sense to have one short "OPES Requirements" draft that lists all
>  available drafts and describes the relationship between them? Or do we
>  want to repeat pretty much the same explanations in every draft
>  instead? Are there similar cases in other WG?

Hilarie