RE: [end points comm] OPES System

[jfcm <info@xxxxxxxx>]

At 19:41 18/08/03, Alex Rousskov wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, jfcm wrote:
> > I name an OPES domain the area of reponsibility of an operator.
>
> What's an operator or operator responsibility? When Disney-owned
> content is created on and made available via Akamai servers, is Disney
> an operator? Is Akamai? Is Disney+Akamai?

This is where you are confusing the issues by pleasure.
The responsible operator is the one saying he is responsible.
Stick to your airline image and do not make too many layer violation.

NO processor should be without domain operator.  And no processor can be 
with two separate domain owner. Otherwise I will/people will _NEVER_ 
trust.use an OPES.

This means that every processor MUST be something and that something is to 
be decided by its operator. And as a SYSTEM user I must be able to 
say/decide if I trust or not an operator for who he is or for the 
information he discloses or for the cost of his services.

You just do not pick any cab (system) because they are cabs. And every cab 
has a number makingtem part of a domain/company. They can fake them, they 
can hide them. It is up to you to decide if you trust or not a hiden number 
cab, for example because you like the name of the cab company or because 
you want to commit suicide.

jfc






> Alex.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 04/08/03