Hi,
At this stage our charter does not focus on proxylet or how rules are loaded to the opes processor.
Abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Red K [mailto:redkresearch@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:05 AM
> To: Alex Rousskov
> Cc: ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: is there OPES prototype proxy?
>
>
>
> Yes, I also mentioned that proxylet is not discussed
> for a long time. But what is the reason for this?
>
> Is it related to system efficiency and simple
> maintainance? I mean to setup one callout server is
> easy to maintain and higher efficient to carry out
> specific service than put them onto a single host.
>
> --- Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote: >
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Red K wrote:
> >
> > > It is an fresh man's topic. But I still want to
> > know if there is any
> > > prototype OPES proxy that supports Proxylet Local
> > Execution
> > > Environment Java Binding V0.1. Thus I can develope
> > my proxylet
> > > because I am interested in OPES.
> >
> > I am working on a prototype OPES proxy. It almost
> > talks OCP to a
> > prototype callout service being developed by Martin
> > Stecher. There is
> > no proxylet support. I heard proxylets were a
> > popular topic long time
> > ago, but there were no proxylets mentioned on this
> > list for quite a
> > while now. If you are interested in OPES, the
> > shortest path to a
> > working system may be to write a callout server that
> > speaks OCP. One
> > can write such a server in Java, of course.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Alex.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Play now and stand a chance to win cash prizes!
> http://yahoo.com.sg/millionaire
>