Re: moving along on rules language

[Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Marshall Rose wrote:

> > > (we also need that other document you were working on.)
> >
> > It is in the IESG queue.
>
> IESG queue? i don't think so. you meant to say that you sent it to
> the I-D repository, right?

Probably. I just send to internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx without knowing what
it is called. I know the reaction is not immediate or 100% automated
so I called it an IESG queue. Sorry for using the wrong term.

The drafts have been published this morning.

Thanks,

Alex.