> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: Markus Hofmann
> Cc: OPES WG
> Subject: Re: [opes-end-comm]: What is traceable in an OPES Flow?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Markus Hofmann wrote:
>
> > I'd suggest that the document includes and explains these
> thoughts and
> > reasons - just along the lines of your comments below. It
> will help to
> > decide whether we've consesus or not.
>
> Yes, as a separate non-normative "Rationale" section or
> subsection. While I do want to document our rationale, I am
> afraid that if it is intermingled with normative text than
> people will find a mistake or a loophole in our reasoning and
> will use that as a reason to violate a related MUST. This
> common problem is especially dangerous when we talk about
> controversial and poorly defined concepts as OPES.
>
> Alex.
>
--------Abbie
Agreed