Hi,
yes, no problem.
But we should be very clear on the boundary.
I really do not want to start an something that is optional that ends being fully in scope and a ticket for a new disaster.
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Hofmann [mailto:markus@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:19 PM
> To: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A11:EXCH]
> Cc: OPES Group
> Subject: Re: Optional Notification?
>
>
> Abbie Barbir wrote:
>
> > I think we can mention that, but I really doubt that we should get
> > involved in it.
> >
> > Aptional Notification in my opnion should be out of scope.
>
> I agree in that we do *not* want to take on the specification of a
> separate notification protocol, but getting the necessary hooks into
> HTTP/OCP binding is very well in scope (e.g. using an additional HTTP
> header as discussed).
>
> -Markus
>
>