[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip

To: "OPES WG (E-mail)" <ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:46:36 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openproxy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openproxy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openproxy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Martin Stecher wrote:

> > Wont-Look-Body: 2147483647
> > rather than
> > Wont-Send-Body: 2147483647
>
> It will be
>
> Wont-Look-Body: 0

Agreed. Wont-Send offset semantics (will not send anything up to the
specified point) is going to be different from the Wont-Look semantics
(will not look at anything beyond the specified point). Right?

I hope that is OK. If not, we can have more explicit names:

	Wont-Look-Body-After:
	Wont-Send-Body-Before:

or something of that kind.

Alex.

References:
- RE: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
  - From: Martin Stecher
- RE: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
  - From: Alex Rousskov
- Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
  - From: Martin Stecher
- Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
  - From: Alex Rousskov
- Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
  - From: Martin Stecher

Prev by Date: Re: documenting OCP parameters
Next by Date: Re: Getting Out Of The Loop optimization broken
Previous by thread: Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
Next by thread: RE: what-parts-to-send-or-skip
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread