Re: Which SMTP element?

[Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote:

> While I agree, where' then back to having a single - albeit more
> focused - SMTP milestone. Ted's original suggestion was that a
> singel milestone seems a bit monolithicand that it might be
> worthwhile to split the SMTP work into multiple milestones.
>
> Now, with the more focused and narrow SMTP milestone, that might be
> ok, but if anyone has any suggestions...

If several milestones are highly desirable, we can split SMTP work
into "generic MIME" and "SMTP-specific" sections of the same draft and
then base milestones on those sections.

Moreover, we can add "SMTP command adaptation" section/milestone (as
opposed to SMTP MIME message adaptation), if that is in scope. BTW, is
it?

Alex.