[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64

To: Markus Hofmann <markus@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
From: Rob Siemborski <robsiemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:38:44 +0530
Cc: ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openproxy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openproxy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openproxy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <21822625.1129744607@192.168.100.57> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 10/19/05, Markus Hofmann <markus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  From the lack of feedback on the list, should we assume that no one has
> any issues with the proposal, that we're right on track and can quickly
> move forward to submit to IESG? If not, please speak up *now*.

Given the lack of traffic on this list (and indeed, the amount of time
it took to find someone to write this draft) I highly doubt this is a
safe assumption.

-Rob

--
Rob Siemborski        |     PGP:0x5CE32FCC    |     robsiemb@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Engineer     |                       |            650-623-6925

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Markus Hofmann

References:
- Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Markus Hofmann
- Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Markus Hofmann

Prev by Date: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Next by Date: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Previous by thread: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Next by thread: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread