[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64

To: Rob Siemborski <robsiemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
From: Markus Hofmann <markus@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:53:23 -0400
Cc: ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openproxy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openproxy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openproxy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <21822625.1129744607@192.168.100.57> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openproxy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Windows/20051006)

Rob Siemborski wrote:

Given the lack of traffic on this list (and indeed, the amount of time
it took to find someone to write this draft) I highly doubt this is a
safe assumption.

Then please speak up.

Thanks,
  Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: jfcm

References:
- Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Markus Hofmann
- Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Markus Hofmann
- Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
  - From: Rob Siemborski

Prev by Date: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Next by Date: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Previous by thread: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Next by thread: Re: Request for agenda items at IETF 64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread