Archive of ietf-pkix, by date

• Re: PKIX WG Last Call: 3770bis, Peter Gutmann, 04/08/2005
• pExttandder is now here! Dont waise your time imprecate, Bernadine Alvarado, 04/08/2005
• Re: PKIX WG Last Call: 3770bis, Peter Sylvester, 04/08/2005
• PKIX WG Last Call: 3770bis, Tim Polk, 04/07/2005
• If you want origeenal software, this is for you breton, Vincent Atwood, 04/02/2005
• Posses whatever drag you want caveman, Gina Meyers, 04/02/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-pkalgs-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 04/01/2005
• Issue #5 - AIA in CRL draft, Stefan Santesson, 03/30/2005
• draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-18.txt comments, Frank Balluffi, 03/29/2005
• Tha new rawlex repliccas has finelly arrived bloodshot, Paulette Rowell, 03/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Peter Sylvester, 03/23/2005
• Get your hand clock repliacs todday crud, Michele Waddell, 03/21/2005
• Comments on SCVP, Denis Pinkas, 03/21/2005
• Fwd: RFC 3647 - CP vs CPS, VAHUJA, 03/17/2005
• Re: RFC 3279: ECDSA and ECDH keyUsage Text, Daniel Brown, 03/17/2005
• RFC 3279: ECDSA and ECDH keyUsage Text, Sean P. Turner, 03/17/2005
• RE: RFC 3647 - CP vs CPS, Santosh Chokhani, 03/17/2005
• Re: RFC 3647 - CP vs CPS, Kazin, Joel, 03/17/2005
• RFC 3647 - CP vs CPS, VAHUJA, 03/17/2005
• Want to get the rollax you've dreamt of? curbside, Carey Gray, 03/15/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-09.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/15/2005
• draft meeting minutes, Stephen Kent, 03/11/2005
• Re: 3280bis: OtherName "health warning", Sean P. Turner, 03/10/2005
• Re: 3280bis: OtherName "health warning", Russ Housley, 03/10/2005
• Re: 3280bis: OtherName "health warning", Tom Gindin, 03/10/2005
• Ackquire all the me ds you need in one place! bookie, Reva Rosado, 03/10/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Wen-Cheng Wang, 03/09/2005
• Re: 3280bis internationalization section, Paul Hoffman, 03/09/2005
• Re: 3280bis internationalization section, Stephen Farrell, 03/09/2005
• 3280bis: OtherName "health warning", Sean P. Turner, 03/09/2005
• Re: 3280bis internationalization section, wpolk, 03/09/2005
• Re: 3280bis internationalization section, Paul Hoffman, 03/09/2005
• Re: 3280bis internationalization section, Russ Housley, 03/09/2005
• 3280bis internationalization section, Paul Hoffman, 03/08/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Peter Sylvester, 03/08/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Denis Pinkas, 03/08/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Denis Pinkas, 03/08/2005
• Protocol Action: 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 03/07/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Stephen Kent, 03/07/2005
• "Final" PKIX Agenda, wpolk, 03/07/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/07/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Denis Pinkas, 03/07/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Nathalie Jolly, 03/07/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/07/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Denis Pinkas, 03/07/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, J Adrian Pickering, 03/05/2005
• alert the PKIX working group of a potential intellectual property issue, John Hines, 03/05/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Michael Myers, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Dave Engberg, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Eric Rescorla, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Stephen Kent, 03/04/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, David A. Cooper, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Stephen Kent, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Dave Engberg, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, todd glassey, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Guida, Richard [JJCUS], 03/04/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, David A. Cooper, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Robert Zuccherato, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Stephen Farrell, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Guida, Richard [JJCUS], 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Stefan Santesson, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Paul Hoffman, 03/04/2005
• Colliding RFC 3161 time-stamp tokens, via MD5-collisions, Alfonso De Gregorio, 03/04/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Robert Zuccherato, 03/04/2005
• RE: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Seth Hitchings, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Eric Rescorla, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Peter Gutmann, 03/04/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/04/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, David A. Cooper, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Dr Stephen Henson, 03/03/2005
• Comments on SCVP draft 18, Sharon Boeyen, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Eric Norman, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Russ Housley, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Sam Roberts, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Ben Laurie, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Eric Rescorla, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Tom Gindin, 03/03/2005
• Re: [saag] Another bad day at the hash function factory, Eric Norman, 03/02/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/02/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/02/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/02/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Russ Housley, 03/02/2005
• RE: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 03/02/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Eric Rescorla, 03/02/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Ben Laurie, 03/02/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/02/2005
• Re: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Paul Hoffman, 03/01/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Tim Polk, 03/01/2005
• X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, Russ Housley, 03/01/2005
• Re: One final week of Last Call for SCVP, Peter Sylvester, 03/01/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Nathalie Jolly, 03/01/2005
• RE: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Michael Myers, 02/28/2005
• Re: One final week of Last Call for SCVP, Stephen Kent, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Peter Sylvester, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, David A. Cooper, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Denis Pinkas, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, David A. Cooper, 02/28/2005
• [no subject], wpolk, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Peter Sylvester, 02/28/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/28/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Denis Pinkas, 02/28/2005
• Re: One final week of Last Call for SCVP, Denis Pinkas, 02/28/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Denis Pinkas, 02/28/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Peter Sylvester, 02/27/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 18, Olivier Dubuisson, 02/27/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Olivier Dubuisson, 02/27/2005
• Comments to SCVP ID 18, Peter Sylvester, 02/27/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Peter Sylvester, 02/27/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Peter Sylvester, 02/27/2005
• EuroPKI workshop, David Chadwick, 02/27/2005
• RE: About RFC 3280bis, Dave Engberg, 02/25/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, wpolk, 02/25/2005
• One final week of Last Call for SCVP, Tim Polk, 02/25/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, Stephen Farrell, 02/25/2005
• RE: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Michael Myers, 02/25/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Peter Sylvester, 02/25/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, wpolk, 02/25/2005
• Re: About RFC 3280bis, wpolk, 02/25/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Tom Gindin, 02/25/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/24/2005
• About RFC 3280bis, Denis Pinkas, 02/24/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Denis Pinkas, 02/24/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/23/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, Wen-Cheng Wang, 02/23/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Tom Gindin, 02/23/2005
• draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509 -> PS, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 02/22/2005
• RE: OCSP in IKEv2, draft -02, Michael Myers, 02/22/2005
• OCSP in IKEv2, draft -02, Michael Myers, 02/22/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-18.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/21/2005
• Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17, David A. Cooper, 02/18/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, marc . jadoul, 02/18/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, marc . jadoul, 02/18/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, marc . jadoul, 02/18/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, David A. Cooper, 02/18/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, marc . jadoul, 02/18/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, David A. Cooper, 02/18/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, Peter Gutmann, 02/17/2005
• Re: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, todd glassey, 02/17/2005
• 3280bis available from NIST web site, Tim Polk, 02/17/2005
• RE: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Seth Hitchings, 02/17/2005
• Comments to SCVP ID 17, Wen-Cheng Wang, 02/17/2005
• RE: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, Santosh Chokhani, 02/17/2005
• Re: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, Peter Gutmann, 02/16/2005
• Re: PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, Tim Polk, 02/16/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Peter Sylvester, 02/16/2005
• PKIX implications of SHA-1 collisions, Russ Housley, 02/16/2005
• Re[2]: Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Masaki SHIMAOKA, 02/16/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/16/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Peter Sylvester, 02/16/2005
• Re: Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Wen-Cheng Wang, 02/16/2005
• Re: Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 02/16/2005
• Re[2]: Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Masaki SHIMAOKA, 02/16/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Steven Legg, 02/15/2005
• RE: SCVP 16 comments deadline, Trevor Freeman, 02/15/2005
• PKIX Agenda Requests for 62nd IETF, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, David A. Cooper, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/15/2005
• RE: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Michael Myers, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Peter Sylvester, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 17-45, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-17.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/15/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-2797-bis-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/15/2005
• Re: Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 02/15/2005
• SCVP draft 17 available now! (Was Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes), Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• SCVP 16 comments 17-45, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• SCVP 16 comments 1-16, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Tim Polk, 02/15/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• Re: SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Denis Pinkas, 02/15/2005
• Question about updating the CA to change its DN encoding, Masaki SHIMAOKA, 02/15/2005
• SCVP Draft 17: Summary of changes, Tim Polk, 02/14/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/11/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Peter Sylvester, 02/11/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-pkixrep-03.txt, Stephen Farrell, 02/11/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/11/2005
• RE: Draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-07, Jim Schaad, 02/11/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-pkixrep-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/10/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/10/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Julien Stern, 02/10/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/10/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/10/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/10/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/10/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/10/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Stefan Santesson, 02/10/2005
• RE: Draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-07, Sharon Boeyen, 02/09/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Peter Sylvester, 02/09/2005
• Re: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Michael Ströder, 02/09/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Matt Cooper, 02/08/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-gost-cppk-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/08/2005
• FW: SCVP 16 comments, Trevor Freeman, 02/08/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/08/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Stefan Santesson, 02/08/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Matt Cooper, 02/08/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Russ Housley, 02/08/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Peter Sylvester, 02/08/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Matt Cooper, 02/07/2005
• Re: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Michael Ströder, 02/07/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Stefan Santesson, 02/07/2005
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/07/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Russ Housley, 02/04/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Stefan Santesson, 02/04/2005
• Re: AIA and draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Russ Housley, 02/04/2005
• AIA and draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Juergen Brauckmann, 02/04/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Russ Housley, 02/04/2005
• RE: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Matt Cooper, 02/03/2005
• Re: draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Russ Housley, 02/03/2005
• draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt comments, Matt Cooper, 02/03/2005
• Re: Question about RFC3379, Russ Housley, 02/03/2005
• Question about RFC3379, yquenechdu, 02/03/2005
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-archive-01.txt, Jim Schaad, 02/02/2005
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-pkix-ecc-pkalgs-ecdsa-00.txt, Russ Housley, 02/02/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-archive-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/01/2005
• WG last call, Stephen Kent, 01/28/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-crlaia-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/26/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/25/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/25/2005
• Draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-08, Jim Schaad, 01/24/2005
• RFC 3770 Errata, Russ Housley, 01/22/2005
• Document Action: 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Certification Path Building' to Informational RFC, The IESG, 01/10/2005
• Re: Draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-07, Stephen Kent, 01/07/2005
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-certpathbuild-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/07/2005
• Re: SCVP 16 comments deadline, Denis Pinkas, 01/05/2005
• RE: RFC 3280 and multiple Organization (O) fields in DN, Slone, Skip, 01/03/2005
• Re: RFC 3280 and multiple Organization (O) fields in DN, Russ Housley, 01/03/2005
• Re: RFC 3280 and multiple Organization (O) fields in DN, Jostein Tveit, 01/03/2005
• 2005 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS '05), Karen Seo, 01/02/2005
• Celebrate a victory in love, Arron Brennan, 05/15/2004
• Give her more pleasure, Yamashita, 12/12/2001
• his to receipts, therefore as, 01/18/2001
• Oblivion hearing hackers, singer., 10/21/2000
• Adobe products , windows titles all have 80% less then usual price, Staci Pereira, 01/01/2000

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.