Re: Comments to SCVP ID 17

[Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> Peter,
> 
> Quoting Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> >  Long ago I explained probably even in this list
> >  a difference between French and German behaviour.
> 
> I had forgotten this one.  Thanks for reviving it!

Anyway, you have not understood that I was really inviting you 
to read all of Denis' comments with an appropriate understanding 
of the diplomatic decorations. 

Thant's not the only thing you have forgotten. I have
counted exactly but it seems alost 1 out of 2 that
you announce 2 weeks deadlines or so just before
an IETF meeting. You had been reminded that this 
is not exactly an appropriate way, and you promised
not to repeat, well.

 
> > > Consider your message deleted.
> > 
> > I think you should at least consider point 16 :-)
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> 
> I was intrigued by your reference to Denis' point 16, so I went to the archive 
> for the message and searched for "16."  Upon reading the last screen, numbers 
> 14 and 16 merit a response.  
> 
> > 14. Since both one of the security area directors and one of the co-
> >  chairs of PKIX are editors, I request that both the other security area
> >  director and the other PKIX co-chair take a look at the debate: Tim, the
> >  over-ever optimistic, being both editor of the draft and PKIX co-chair
> >  cannot be in a position to say when a rough consensus will be reached.
> 
> I am sure that Steve will be glad to judge consensus.  And yes, when the 
> document is forwarded, it has to go to Sam Hartman.

I understandt that we can consider then your other message concerning 
another announcement for deadline as obsolete. Modify my comment
above acordingly.   

Peter

PS: not having commented Denis' and Wen-Cheng's messages does not
mean that I disagree with them (at least not with all of them).