[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis-01: OID Import




Note: I am starting a separate thread for each of the unresolved issues. I hope this draws more people into the discussion.

Peter:

> >4 *** The OID arcs should be imported from
> >
> >
> >IMPORTS
> >
> >    id-pe, id-kp
> >    FROM PKIX1Explicit88 { iso(1) identified-organization(3)
> >             dod(6) internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7)
> >             id-mod(0) id-pkix1-explicit(18) }
> >
> >    id-aca FROM
> >    PKIXAttributeCertificate {iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6)
> >                 internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
> >                 id-mod-attribute-cert(12)}
>
> This is a matter of taste. Neither approach leads to implementation issues.

Since, as you say, there are no implmentation issues. but this is not
a matter of taste. Importing the correct definition is something else
that making the 'hopefully' identical one.

There is ONE authoritive place to have 'this' id-aca defined.
(and another id-aca elsewhere)

I do not know about other people, but would rather avoid IMPORT statements for simple things. IMPORT is a great tool for complex structures, but for a simple constant, it is not worth the effort.

I have had to make edits to old ASN.1 modules to avoid errors that are introduced when one modules imports stuff from another that imports stuff from another that imports stuff from another. The changes are almost always in parts that are not needed for the part that is needed. I'll give a recent example.

RFC 2634 imports from CMS.  The ASN.1 module says:

-- RFC 2630: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
    ContentType, IssuerAndSerialNumber, SubjectKeyIdentifier
    FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax
       { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
         pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) cms(1) }

I needed to change this to:

-- RFC 3852: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
    ContentType, IssuerAndSerialNumber, SubjectKeyIdentifier
    FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax2004
       { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
         pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) cms-2004(24) }

Why? It did not have anything to do with ContentType, IssuerAndSerialNumber, or SubjectKeyIdentifier. It had to do with something else in the RFC 2630 module.

I would rather not have to make these kinds of edits, so I prefer to duplicate simple constants like OID arcs.

Russ