[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix

To: "Stefan Santesson" <stefans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:41:46 -0400
Cc: <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxx>, "Tim Polk" <tim.polk@xxxxxxxx>, "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>, <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944029816A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .com>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944029816A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .com>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Stefan,

I think you should coordinate this with some folks in the DNS arena,as well. There have been many proposals for extensions to DNS, orancillary technology that relies on DNS, that have foundered becauseof subtle issues associated with DNS management, server softwarelimitations, etc.


Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix
  - From: Russ Housley

Prev by Date: RE: Absent keyUsage in certificates
Next by Date: RE: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix
Previous by thread: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix
Next by thread: Re: Defining an SRV RR Other name in pkix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread