Russ:
Are there any guidelines for CRL owner names, since they're
covered in the draft although DNS distribution points aren't detailed in
RFC 3280? If there aren't any, IMHO a reasonable rule would be that if
any sequence member of the distribution point name is a domain name (not a
URI), that should be used. Also (and lower in precedence), if any
sequence member of the distribution point name is an RFC 822 address, its
standard translation should be used. I doubt if URI's will work without
conflicts.
I don't know if these count as "concerns".
Tom Gindin
P.S. The opinions above are mine, and not necessarily those of my
employer.