Re: Little question about CRL

[yquenechdu@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi,

I had understood that.
What I seek to understand it is the goal to have indicated the field
signature in the LCR.

Thanks
Yannick Quenec'hdu.

> This same structure is used for the X.509 certificate itself.  One of the
> values is covered by the signature, and the other is not.
>
> Russ
>
> At 08:50 AM 10/20/2005, yquenechdu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Why a LCR contains two fields identical, a field signatureAlgorithm for
>>CertificatList and another field signature for TBSList
>>
>>Knowing that "This field MUST contain the same algorithm to identify ace
>> the
>>signature field in the sequence tbsCertList"
>>
>>Thank you for your answers
>>Yannick Quenec'hdu
>
>
>