[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OCSP revision

To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OCSP revision
From: Dr Stephen Henson <shenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:36:41 +0000
In-reply-to: <200511081852.jA8IqJh8006705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <200511081852.jA8IqJh8006705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616

Carl Wallace wrote:

> At the meeting yesterday, OCSP revisions to address algorithm agility were
> discussed.  Since the doc is being revised, I suggest an extension or field
> be added to enable clients to ask the responder to include the responder's
> certificate in the response (similar to the certReq field in RFC3161).  
> 

Could other OCSP revisions be incorporated at the same time or just
"algorithm agility"?

Steve.
-- 
Dr Stephen N. Henson.
Core developer of the   OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Freelance consultant see: http://www.drh-consultancy.co.uk/
Email: shenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, PGP key: via homepage.

Follow-Ups:
- RFC-3280 [Subject Information Access]
  - From: Massimiliano Pala

References:
- OCSP revision
  - From: Carl Wallace

Prev by Date: OCSP revision
Next by Date: Re: draft minutes (SCVP part)
Previous by thread: OCSP revision
Next by thread: RFC-3280 [Subject Information Access]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread