Looks good to me. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Myers > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:04 PM > To: Russ Housley; Ted Hardie > Cc: iesg@xxxxxxxx; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Last Call summary for draft-ietf-pkix-cert-utf8 > > > works for me > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:11 AM > > > Ted: > > Thanks for the improved text. Here it is all put together: > > When strings are mapped from internal representations to > visual representations, sometimes two different strings will > have the same or similar visual representations. This can > happen for many different reasons, including use of similar > glyphs and use of composed characters (such as e + ' equaling > U+00E9, the Korean composed characters, and vowels above > consonant clusters in certain languages). As a result of > this situation, people doing visual comparisons between two > different names may think they are the same when in fact they > are not. Also, people may mistake one string for another. > Issuers of certificates and relying parties both need to be > aware of this situation. > > This does not impose any untestable requirements. Any > concerns with this text? > > Russ > > > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature