[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis

To: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
From: Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:22:06 +0200
Cc: Tom Gindin <tgindin@xxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44368C56.2070001@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <OFD73E21B3.3D03D3C7-ON85257146.006820AA-85257147.000939A2@xxxxxxxxxx> <44368C56.2070001@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417

Peter Sylvester wrote:
> 
> The major error that I see all the time is that the order is inverse.
> since it is not clear
> in which order things are displayed by tools, or better it is not clear
> depending
> of the cultural whether 'first displayed' is highest or lowest.

IMHO RFC3280 does not clearly specify how to read the DN
strings in appendix C.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
  - From: Tom Gindin
- Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
  - From: Peter Sylvester

Prev by Date: Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
Next by Date: Reminder - Submission Deadline for The Second Cryptographic Hash Workshop Approaching (5/12/2006)
Previous by thread: Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
Next by thread: Re: order of name attributes in certificates, suggestion for 3280 bis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread