[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
Paul,
It is not clear why pre-image issue is relevant. The root public key or
self-signed certificate needs protections other than own signature and
hence hashing algorithm strength is not an issue. Signature on the
certificate buys nothing security wise.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:23 PM
To: ROGER YOUNGLOVE; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
At 9:38 AM -0500 1/29/07, ROGER YOUNGLOVE wrote:
>i believe that SHA1 is not sufficient for a 20 year root CA lifespan.
It would be useful to know where that belief comes from. To date,
there have been no suggestions of any weakness for SHA-1 against
preimage attacks. Also to date, no one has suggested that it is
possible for anyone to brute-force a cryptographic primitive that
would require 2^160 iterations.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium