[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA

To: Mike <mike-list@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
From: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:57:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <45BE39EC.5040907@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <BAY106-F33A6ECAF0FBDCF9F789787FCA70@xxxxxxx> <7.0.0.16.2.20070129111756.04ab17b0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <45BE39EC.5040907@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Mike:

What RFC defines the OID's, etc. for RSA with SHA-256 et. al.?


RFC 4055

Russ

References:
- SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
  - From: ROGER YOUNGLOVE
- Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
  - From: Mike

Prev by Date: RE: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
Next by Date: RE: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
Previous by thread: Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
Next by thread: Re: SHA 1 vs. SHA 256 for Root CA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread