draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-32.txt

["David A. Cooper" <david.cooper@xxxxxxxx>]

All,

I just submitted draft 32 of SCVP for posting.  This draft contains some 
editorial changes to address comments raised as a result of IESG review, 
but there are no changes to the protocol, either syntactic or semantic.  
A diff file comparing drafts 31 and 32 is available at 
http://csrc.nist.gov/pki/documents/PKIX/wdiff_draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-31_to_32.html.

I should note that this draft does not address every issue raised during 
the IESG review.  In particular, there are still outstanding comments 
from Lisa Dusseault relating to the use of HTTP, which is mainly 
specified in Appendix B of SCVP.  Lisa's comments may be found at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-pkix-scvp/comment/65322.  
If there is someone who has a sufficient knowledge of HTTP to address 
the issues that Lisa raises and who is willing to work with us to 
resolve these issues, that would be appreciated.

Dave