Re: TAM as a new WG item?

To: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAM as a new WG item?
From: max pritikin <pritikin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:57:45 -0600
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=pritikin@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=136; t=1198022287; x=1198886287; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=pritikin@xxxxxxxxx; z=From:=20max=20pritikin=20<pritikin@xxxxxxxxx> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20TAM=20as=20a=20new=20WG=20item? |Sender:=20; bh=rGrcpZvx5aykxlxd88c2eDbjKZGHmmKdKd5nPFlZm1A=; b=CUX7P8mOuNB3QxUGrArTMUh0tAqxF6aPLtnk3iW6DY09gXmAveEeKIL+aM IKbKunAnqkyHBJPXTa1eCc6d1NwSDBVdv4UfObIic6kF9XNym/B0iSOo/hsT TPY+G4+xR2;
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx


I am in favor or pursuing this topic.

- max

On Dec 5, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
[original message in your archive]