RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-01.txt

["Turner, Sean P." <turners@xxxxxxxx>]

Good catch. When I updated the key usage list I didn't remove the sentence.
I'll post an updated draft.

spt

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Russ Housley
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:30 PM
>To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-01.txt
>
>
>The second to last paragraph in Section 3 says:
>
>    If the EE certificate keyUsage extension asserts 
>keyAgreement then it
>    MAY assert either encipherOnly or decipherOnly.  However, this
>    specification RECOMMENDS that if cRLSign is present, then
>    keyAgreement, encipherOnly, and decipherOnly SHOULD NOT be present.
>
>I think the second sentence does not seem to fit here.  I 
>think it should be deleted.
>
>Russ
>