Re: WGLCs, etc.

[Stefan Santesson <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good summary Steve,

> Anythig  else?

Yes, 

I think we can conclude the WGLC also on the TAC document as well.

I think the authors have addressed the comments to a reasonable extent given
that this is an experimental document.

I think this document is ready for IESG review once the newly submitted
draft 04 is available.

I'm the cognizant WG co-chair for this document.

/Stefan


On 09-05-25 5:21 PM, "Stephen Kent" <kent@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Folks,
> 
> I have been on vacation and out of the country for most of the last 8
> weeks, so I have fallen behind on various WG administrative matters.
> I apologize for that. (In fact, I am out of the country again,
> attending the LACNIC meeting in Panama this week, and taking another
> week of vacation in Panama, but I'll try to make some progress while
> I'm here.)
> 
> Here is where I think we are relative to various matters:
> 
> Meeting minutes are final.
> 
> Cert-image has been accepted as a new WG item.
> 
> 
> Concluded WGLCs:
> 
> - Authority Clearance: done a while ago, and I am the
> cognizant WG co-chair for this document. One minor edit needs to be
> done, but it does not merit a second WGLC. I hope to send the writeup
> to the IESG this week.
> 
> - PRQP: this WGLC closed a while ago, but max published
> version 3 afterwards, with some changes motivated by initial
> deployment experiences. Max sent a message on 4/24 asking for
> comments, and I saw no responses. So, I will consider the WGLC to
> still be valid, unless there are objections.
> 
> - Trust anchor format: Carl will make a minor edit to the
> ASN.1 module and publish a new version. This version will be sent to
> the IESG for review. I am the cognizant WG co-chair for this document.
> 
> - Other-certs: Stephe  Farrell will make a minor edit in
> AUTH-48. Stefan is the cognizant WG co-chair for this document.
> 
> - sha2-dsa-ecdsa: Several changes are needed to address
> comments that arose during WGLC. The authors need to publish a
> revised version of the document. Paul and Stefan, who provided
> critical comments will review the new version and indicate if they
> are satisfied. If so, we'll consider the WGLC to have completed
> successfully.
> 
> 
> The straw poll on the status of the new ASN.1 closed on 5/22. There
> were 9 votes for OBSOLETE, and 16 (including me) for UPDATE. This
> info will be provided to Tim as per his request.
> 
> 
> Anythig  else?
> 
> Steve
>