Re: Embedded certificate image

[Peter Gutmann <pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stefan Santesson <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>This is the case for RFC 3709, which is the standard we would use to bind a
>cert image to the certificate. RFC 3709 does only offer a URL as means of
>referring to the actual image, it does not offer any other means of local
>storage.

Why not use one of the type-and-value options, OtherLogoTypeInfo or something? 
This just seems like a horrible kludge, like pounding a nail with a scredriver 
because that's what was lying around.

How do you distinguish real URLs from not-a-real-URLs?

Peter.