[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on OCSP and CSL
- To: Massimiliano Pala <madwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: More on OCSP and CSL
- From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:50:38 -0500
- Cc: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <>
- References: <388C9134.384F42E@comune.modena.it><388D5F8A.CC97092B@SURFnet.nl> <388DB8CD.85076CDD@comune.modena.it><38909B93.1F87021F@SURFnet.nl> <>
Massimiliano,
I think we've established that, syntactically, we can represent the
CSL concept using a CRL, with appropriate reason codes. Thus there
is no motivation to create another syntactic construct. A CA can
choose to issues a CDP just for suspended certs if appropriate.
One might choose to propose a new work item, a protocol for
suspension and reinstantiation of certificates, based on the
motivations that you are describing here. Personally, I don't find
them compelling in most instances. For example, the user who leaves
his smart card at work before going on vacation. However, some in
the financial community have suggested such scenarios to justify the
existence of suspension in the first place, so I know that you are
not alone in thinking this way!
Steve