[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: self-signed TSA [Was Re: Private Key Cloning]
- To: PKIX <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: AW: self-signed TSA [Was Re: Private Key Cloning]
- From: Aram Perez <aram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 10:09:12 -0700
- In-reply-to: <>
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Rich Salz wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand your statement of having "*less* to trust".
>
> Sorry, poorly worded.
>
> If I trust the CA that certifies a TSA, then aren't I (by default, and
> certainly by philosophy) trusting EVERY certificate that CA issues?
> Why should I have to?
You shouldn't have to, although this is the model that most public CAs seem
to push and/or encourage. As I mentioned, a possible solution is the the use
of "anchor certificates".
Regards,
Aram Perez