RE: TSP. Version 10, Removal of SIA Extension

[Michael Zolotarev <mzolotarev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I second the proposal.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Sylvester [mailto:Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2000 3:10
> To: mzolotarev@baltimore.com; Denis.Pinkas@bull.net
> Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
> Subject: Re: TSP. Version 10, Removal of SIA Extension
> 
> 
> 
> 
> A TS certificate contains the an access information was a feature in
> the text, having this removed may not easily allow to get it back
> in a next round. 
> 
> I would consider to include the complete definition of SIA in the
> TS text since it is not or not yet defined anywhere else, and
> maybe mention that it is expected that it will be removed later. 
> 
> In this way the feature is described and stable, and when
> as soon as part1 gets updated and the TS text gets moved from
> proposed to draft, one can remove it without having added
> or removed any functionality. 
>  
> > Michael,
> > 
> > > Sounds like its time to get SIA back to TSS draft, Denis :)
> > 
> > "son-of-RFC2459" has not yet passed WG last call, nor IESG 
> last call.
> > Waiting for it would create a delay that could be estimated 
> to be, at best,
> > about two months and thus would mean issuing the TSP RFC 
> next year. :-(
> > 
> > We now need this long-awaited RFC. 
> > 
> > Denis
> > 
> > Note: I have just posted to the web editor an update 
> (version 11) that
> > incorporates the changes that have been noticed (plus one, 
> un-noticed in the
> > ASN1 module !)
>