RE: OCSP-X vs SCVP

[Ambarish Malpani <ambarish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed, we are talking about XML vs DER.

I don't know that XER has enough traction/usage to make it a
viable solution in XML land (even though it would make things
very simple in the ASN.1 land).

Regards,
Ambarish

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ambarish Malpani
Architect                                                650.567.5457
ValiCert, Inc.                                  ambarish@valicert.com
339 N. Bernardo Ave.                          http://www.valicert.com
Mountain View, CA 94043


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Koning [mailto:pkoning@ironstream.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 11:26 AM
> To: ambarish@valicert.com
> Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
> Subject: RE: OCSP-X vs SCVP
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Ambarish" == Ambarish Malpani <ambarish@valicert.com> writes:
> 
>  Ambarish> Hi Guys, Just to keep things simple, it would be good to
>  Ambarish> break up this debate into 2 separate discussions:
> 
>  Ambarish> 1. Should PKIX protocols/work items support XML well or
>  Ambarish> should they just stay with ASN.1
> 
> Are we talking about XML vs. ASN.1 or XML vs. BER/XER/*ER ?   It
> sounds more like the latter, and given that "ASN.1" is sometimes
> mentioned when a more precise reference would be to
> BER/DER/etc. instead, I wonder...
> 
>        paul
>