[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PKIXML session. Was: PKIX WG tentative agenda
- To: PKIX <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PKIXML session. Was: PKIX WG tentative agenda
- From: Aram Perez <aram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 08:58:28 -0800
- In-reply-to: <>
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Polar Humenn wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Tim Polk wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
>> To be honest, I personally believe that XML is an
>> inappropriate encoding format for certificates (public key *or* attribute).
>
> Forgive me, I'm just an academic. So, my I ask, what does the encoding
> format really matter? And especially, why is XML "inappropriate" for
> certificates?
I'm not an academic, and I really don't care if I have to use ASN.1 or XML
to transfer security related information. But I really would like to see an
answer to Polar's questions.
Feliz Navidad,
Aram Perez