[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DPD & DPV requirements
- To: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: DPD & DPV requirements
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 20:29:28 -0500
- Cc: PKIX-List <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
- References: <009601c06682$4bafd4d0$0201a8c0@vincent.se> <v04220800b65fe2367041@[171.78.30.107]> <013101c066c3$d63b4bc0$0201a8c0@vincent.se> <v04220802b660338b1fb9@[171.78.30.107]> <004401c06739$f7b9f550$0201a8c0@vincent.se> <v04220803b67286e11dda@[171.78.30.107]> <> <>
> Given the problems we have had in OCSP (v1) re referring to a target cert,
> I am not comfortable specifying a target cert other than by providing a copy
> of that cert to the server.
It would be nice if some other folks got their lawyers to check about
infringement against that d--n Micali patent I mentioned here some weeks ago.
/r$