Re: Basic Cert-2-Directory mapping question

[Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oscar Jacobsson wrote:
> 
> Bob Jueneman wrote:
> > What we need, and have needed for ten years, is a STANDARD!
> 
> Apart from the fact that RFC 2377 is "only" Informational, are there any
> perceived problems with the naming plan it proposes that I'm unaware of?
> I should probably add that I've yet to attempt to implement an
> infrastructure using this naming scheme yet. :-)

ldap://root.openldap.org

Ciao, Michael.