Re: Basic Cert-2-Directory mapping question

[Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>]

Michael,

> Peter Gutmann wrote:
>  >
>  > Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx> writes:
>  >
>  > >I have not read your paper, but the assertion that DNs don't work, without
>  > >substantiation, seems a bit strong.
>  >
>  > [.. Very many valid points by Peter deleted..]
>
> Peter, I completely agree with you. IMHO one of the main problems
> with
> PKIX is that there's so much X.500 in it. ;-) (I enjoyed your
> writing about T.61...)

Perhaps thinking about the WG name will clarify why there's so much 
X.500 in PKIX.  Were you looking for the SPKI WG list and wound up 
here by accident?

Steve