[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Last Call, PKI Repository Locator

To: Philip Hallam-Baker <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call, PKI Repository Locator
From: Oscar Jacobsson <oscar.jacobsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:38:11 +0100
Cc: Tim Polk <tim.polk@xxxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Organization: Celo Communications
References: <>

Philip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The options are (I guess):
> 
> 1) _pkix._http._tcp
> 2) _pkix_http._tcp
> 3) _pkixhttp._tcp
> 
> I don't really care which we do... (1) seems cleanest???

It does indeed, and seems intuitive enough. BIND 8.2.2 doesn't appear to
have a problem with it either.

//oscar

References:
- RE: WG Last Call, PKI Repository Locator
  - From: Philip Hallam-Baker

Prev by Date: Re: Basic Cert-2-Directory mapping question
Next by Date: Re: Basic Cert-2-Directory mapping question
Previous by thread: RE: WG Last Call, PKI Repository Locator
Next by thread: RE: WG Last Call, PKI Repository Locator
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread