Stephen Kent wrote: > > >IMHO one of the main problems with > >PKIX is that there's so much X.500 in it. ;-) > > Perhaps thinking about the WG name will clarify why there's so much > X.500 in PKIX.
I can also rephrase the sentence with having the same result by saying: The main problems with PKIX is that there's not much X.500 in current implementations any more.