RE: DPD & DPV requirements - Recursion Issues

["Covey, Carlin" <ccovey@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter,

See indented comment below.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Sylvester [mailto:Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:58 AM
To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx; ccovey@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DPD & DPV requirements - Recursion Issues


<snip>

[from Carlin's previous email]
> As I mentioned in an earlier email, one advantage of the recursive data
> structure is that it allows the optional timestamp on the embedded DPD
> responses to be retained.

[from Peter's response]
Whatever is contained in a response, it is left untouched. 

     [Carlin's latest response]   OK, but what if there is no provision in
the 
     DPD response syntax for including an embedded DPD response?  The good
news
     is that the timestamp on the embedded DPD response is untouched.  The
bad
     news is that you can't include an embedded DPD response.  Catch
vingt-deux.

     Regards,  Carlin

------------------------------
- Carlin Covey 
  Cylink Corp.