Re: DPD & DPV Basics

[Steve Hanna <steve.hanna@xxxxxxx>]

Stephen Kent wrote:
> Maybe the root of our disagreement is the assumption of what
> the common requirement is for a DPV client.  My strawman cites
> PKI-ignorant (to use Denis' term) clients as a major motivation for
> DPV, which seems incompatible with a DPV server that requires perfect
> inputs.

>From this message and several others, I gather that the basic motivation
for having a DPV server is to provide services to simple, "PKI-ignorant"
clients. Could someone please supply some examples of such clients? What
protocols will they be speaking (other than the DPV protocol)? This
would be very useful in determining the proper requirements for the DPV
protocol.

Thanks,

Steve