[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WG Last Call: Son-of-2459: More about delta-CRLs
- To: "IETF-PXIX" <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: WG Last Call: Son-of-2459: More about delta-CRLs
- From: "David A. Cooper" <david.cooper@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:42:33 -0500
- In-reply-to: <>
Trevor,
According to X.509, the freshestCRL extension may only be used in certificates:
The freshest CRL extension shall be used only as a certificate extension
and may be used in certificates issued to authorities as well as certificates
issued to users. This field identifies the CRL to which a certificate user should
refer to obtain the freshest revocation information (e.g.: latest dCRL).
X.509 defines a CRL extension, deltaInfo, that could be included in base CRLs, but this extension has not been included in the PKIX profile. The deltaInfo extension is described as follows:
This CRL extension is for use in CRLs that are not dCRLs and is used to
indicate to relying parties that dCRLs are also available for the CRL containing
this extension. The extension provides the location at which the related dCRLs
can be found and optionally the time at which the next dCRL is to be issued.
Dave
At 01:06 PM 3/5/01 -0800, Trevor Freeman wrote:
>TF> given the range of possibilities introduced by having freshest CRL
>in either the certificate or CRL, I would prefer some recommendations on
>what should be done. Having no guidance opens up a large number of
>permutations, and we want to progress this to draft standard, we need to
>refine our scope to what is reasonable, not what is possible.
>
>TF> Having a freshest CRL extension in a CRL provides such an indicator.