RE: Open Issue in Part1: path length constraints

[Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>]

Mike,

> Steve,
>
> We had in fact worked this very issue both onlist and offlist during the
> OCSP drafting stage.  That work led to the consensus view of an OCSP
> Authorized Responder as defined by Section 4.2.2.2 of RFC 2560 (cf. my note
> the list on 06 March).  So it seems we already have a consensus-based notion
> of what to call a non-CA OCSP entity--at least from a standards perspective.
>
> Just trying to save the WG some cycles.

Thanks,

Steve