[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t comments)

To: "Sharon Boeyen" <sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Santosh Chokhani" <chokhani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Russ Housley" <rhousley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t comments)
From: "Michael Myers" <myers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:31 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>

So let's just issue them in different periods with deltas more frequent than
the full.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sharon Boeyen [mailto:sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Santosh Chokhani; Russ Housley; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t
comments)

I agree with Santosh. Forcing the issuance of a full CRL each time a delta
is issued removes the primary value of issuing the delta in the first place.

References:
- RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t comments)
  - From: Sharon Boeyen

Prev by Date: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t comments)
Next by Date: RE: Help Sought on Netscape Revocation URL causing MS Programs to hang
Previous by thread: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.tx t comments)
Next by thread: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.txt comments)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread