RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.txt comments)

[Nada Kapidzic Cicovic <nada@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 05:17 PM 4/23/01 -0700, Carlin Covey wrote:
> I vote with Mike and Santosh.

I also agree with this proposal.

Nada


> - Carlin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Myers [mailto:myers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: Santosh Chokhani; Russ Housley; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last
> Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.txt comments)
>
>
> Santosh,
>
> That is precisely what I'm proposing for the WG's consideration.  But I do
> strongly advocate for a SHALL on full CRL production in any case.  Deltas
> are a systems-level tuning tool.
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santosh Chokhani [mailto:chokhani@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:44 AM
> To: Michael Myers; Santosh Chokhani; Russ Housley; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: delta-CRLs (was Re: Last Call:draft-ietf-pkix-new-part1-06.txt
> comments)
>
>
> Mike:
> I think you are saying that delta can be produced more frequently and there
> need not be a full CRL issued when a delta is issued.
> If the above is correct paraphrasing of your statement, then I agree.