Russ,
I (and I hope others too) deeply appreciate what Paul's doing for us but in the longer run I'm little bit concerned of direct linkage to a potentially ephemeral Web site. I recall my aggravation years ago at having to hunt down authoritative references to OIW OIDs.
Mike
Michael Myers t: +415.819.1362 e: mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx w: http://www.traceroutesecurity.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Housley, Russ > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:06 PM > To: Michael Myers > Cc: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Minor OID mistakes in OCSPv2 and the official OID list > > > I can certainly publish the OID list periodically in an I-D. Say > every six > months. In the I-D, I can say that the files on the IMC web site are > updated more frequently. Are there document editors that do not > know this > already? > > Russ > > At 03:38 PM 5/29/2001 -0700, Michael Myers wrote: > >I think so Russ. At a minimum we need to leave behind a highly > visible and > >definitive OID structure. In my opinion PKIX isn't done until > we document > >all that we've defined. > > > >Mike > > > > > > > >Michael Myers > >t: +415.819.1362 > >e: mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >w: http://www.traceroutesecurity.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Housley, Russ [mailto:rhousley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:32 PM > > > To: Michael Myers > > > Cc: Russ Housley; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: Minor OID mistakes in OCSPv2 and the official OID list > > > > > > > > > Mike: > > > > > > This seems like a reasonable thing to do as the PKIX WG is winding > > > down. Is there really any point in a document that documents the > > > current snapshot? > > > > > > Russ > > > > > > At 02:13 PM 5/29/2001 -0700, Michael Myers wrote: > > > >Russ, > > > > > > > >Good to hear of this. Thanks. Any chance for an Informational > > > >I-D laying out the OID structure? I'm willing to help. > > > > > > > >Mi >