Re: draft delta crl text (contradiction)

[Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> then it would allowed to have a fully conformant implementation by issuing
> all CRLs with the same number, e.g. one. I do not believe that this was the
> intent. The intent is to be able to identify unambiguously CRLs from the
> same CRL Issuer using the CRL number. So two CRLs cannot have the same
> number.
> 
> See additional arguments in my (coming) reply to Dave.
> 

Denis, do You think that annex C of X.509, although it doesn't
form an intyegral part of the Recommendation is against "what
was 'intended'" ?