Re: draft delta crl text (contradiction)

[Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> Peter,
> 
> > > then it would allowed to have a fully conformant implementation by issuing
> > > all CRLs with the same number, e.g. one. I do not believe that this was the
> > > intent. The intent is to be able to identify unambiguously CRLs from the
> > > same CRL Issuer using the CRL number. So two CRLs cannot have the same
> > > number.
> > >
> > > See additional arguments in my (coming) reply to Dave.
> > >
> > 
> > Denis, do You think that annex C of X.509, although it doesn't
> > form an intyegral part of the Recommendation is against "what
> > was 'intended'" ?
> 
> Unless you provide more information, it is quite hard to know what you mean
> here. Is there a problem with :


The example show different CRL with the same number.