[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Revoking bogus certificates

To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Revoking bogus certificates
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:04:37 -0400
Cc: pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

If Peter is correct about CMP -- the EE can reject the cert after the CA
signs it -- then I do not see we CANNOT have "neverValid."
	/r$

References:
- RE: Revoking bogus certificates
  - From: Peter Gutmann

Prev by Date: Re: delta CRLs - NR assumptions
Next by Date: Re: Revoking bogus certificates
Previous by thread: RE: Revoking bogus certificates
Next by thread: RE: Revoking bogus certificates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread