Re: charter revisions

[Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>]

At 10:35 AM +0100 8/30/01, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Steve (K),
>
> I'd have to agree with Steve H, though maybe not as strongly.
>
> My suggestion would be to limit the additional items to the
> dpd/dpv.
>
> In addition the replacement charter text doesn't mention the
> fact that PKIX has profiled the X.509 AC which I guess I can't
> let pass:-)
>
> Stephen.

Steve,

Gee, 3 Steve's in one message! I'll add mention of the Ac profile.

Steve