[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logos: objection to charter revisions
After seeing all that discussion about logos, I realized that we had
a solution (i.e. the draft writen by Stefan) for an unknown problem.
1) Are logos to be used in server certificates ?
If so, what would be their intended meaning ?
2) Are logos to be used in human-user certificates ?
If so, what would be their intended meaning ?
3) Are logos to be used in CA certificates ?
If so, what would be their intended meaning ?
4) Are logos to be used in self-signed certificates ?
If so, what would be their intented meaning ?
I do not think that the meaning and the use of the logo information will
necessarilly be the same for all of the above cases.
If that topic is going to stay on the charter, before we define a solution
we should first define the requirements. So an INFORMATIONAL RFC on the
requirements should be the first step. This Informational RFC should at
least answer to the questions raised above.
Denis