Re: Logos: objection to charter revisions

[Steve Hanna <steve.hanna@xxxxxxx>]

"Manger, James H" wrote:
> You says "nobody has been able to come up with any way to fix [the
> current logo proposal]" and conclude "that it can't be fixed".
>  .. but you provide fixes earlier in the same e-mail!

That will teach me to offer constructive suggestions! ;-)

> Your statement that logos should be "ignored unless all certificates in the
> path indicate that they should be supported" is just the sort of "logo
> constraint" that enables safe use of logos.

I still wouldn't call this "safe". There are other concerns that haven't
have been addressed (problems with scaling or color mapping,
accessibility concerns, etc.). But at least a "logo constraint" (or,
more accurately, a "logo enabler") would restrict use of logos to
communities that have considered these concerns and decided that they
are acceptable.

-Steve