Re: Motions before the WG - Was Re: Software for PKI

[Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> The IETF's allowing this to
> happen is part and parcel to supporting it actively.

I don't think it's like trademark in that it requires an active defense.

> Comment #2    - If an RFC has commercial value, and the WG Chair's stop
> I-D's from becoming RFC's then they have done damage and it is likely
> restraint of trade.

I thought you were using #1 as the proof for the if in #2.

> If I can reference a RFC like a Standard then what pray tell do I need the
> ISOC or the IESG for?

Exactly.

plonk.
	/r$